One is not referential, hence not categorizable - one is neither one ..
....nor many .....
...nor none.
And neither..... the not-one, not-many, not-none.
Not being referential, categorizable…… "interactings happen" …
…..in and as the realm where referring and hence categorization..
..
(thought, memory, qualities, measurement, me and you)...occurs.
The categorizable and non-catagorizable have nothing to keep them apart..
... no wall or division.
Thus... samsara is nirvana... maya is the action of brahman.
Or the immeasurable measuring itself, the formless forming
...
without separating …
.... Atma is Brahman....
.... the individual's awareness is the global awareness.
Regardless of what we say, or what teachings occur, the non-referential..
.. the non-categorizable remains as not quantifiable or understandable
in terms of categories.
Expression is, thus, unexpressed.
Happenings are not manifesting.
The manifest as the unmanifest……
….. is the non-manifestation of everything experienced.
This sounds like a negation, in words.
Because it isn't in words……… it is neither in negation……
…nor in affirmation.
In terms of one's immediate being………the unconditional unmanifest……
…… is this very presence/awareness that is not separable...
...
from the textures of sensory experience.
One is this.
Nirvana is samsara.
God is the very relativity ………..of seemingly real ……experience(s).
Unconditional presence involves no attachment to any aspect..
..of the arising and dissolving of textures, of sensings.
Any sense of attachment is, itself, simply a sensing that arises and dissolves.
There is no one separable outside of manifestation.....
..
which could be manifesting, or which could attach.
Nor anyone separable inside of manifestation who could be experiencing it.
. or moving from one moment into another moment..
.. or communicating about it.
Thus……….. there is nothing outside of oneself…….. to get.
There is no one inside of oneself …………to communicate with.
Comings and goings, divisions, measurement...
...sensings (including pixelled communications like this)..
..
.. seem to arise in juxtaposition……… in contrast.
Contrast can be termed as "activity of mind."
As no separable mind can be found anywhere ………
……which could be holding onto one state to contrast it
with another state (or to a sensation, experience, or object) ……
…...comings and goings are understood immediately, nonseparately……
… as one's being……….. as this very unnameable being.
In terms of thought and speech, this is paradox.
Aka…… the unnameable as named……
….. the unquantifiable as measured……. the quality-less as experiences.
Yet, immediately, there is no paradox, just day-to-day living..
...
moment-to-moment sensing.
And thus, explanations (such as this one) can only be for fun.
To take any explanation too seriously would be ... well, too serious and not much fun.
As if something were to be achieved through the explaining.
Paradox lived is one's "being" accepted ……an acceptance which ..
……. is really beyond acceptance or rejection…
….. and thus…….. there is no sense of any paradoxy.
Back to Path of Understanding-Index Page