28th May 2003
Does this statement mean that
the "self-realized entity" feels the emotions and experiences them
full-fold as they arise? Or does the "witnessing" described above
suggest that there is a certain detachment, a kind of buffer, from those
emotions (whatever they may be)?
I would be curious to read various views on this.
IME it is both...emotions arise, full speed and range but there is no identification with them..they move like energy through me...
..it feels like being on stage and playing theater.
C., what does it
mean, being on stage and playing theatre?
Is it like
...............acting totally and completely the particular role of the moment
........and .......simultaneoulsy observing your act?
Very odd because it looks so convincing to the surroundings ..but then the problem is people respond also like I was identified and communication breaks down..
Why does it break
down from your side?
it feels like a play and there is the outcome but nothing to say about it...
Ahaaa, C, those
waffles do smell great.
Expand on what you
I am all ears, all
i experimented with this on another list and of course I got immediately into trouble...it was interpreted like it was an absolute truth and that felt odd...
What felt odd?
this leaves me in a odd position..how do you talk if no one understands you?
So do you talk to
generate understandings all around?
Or do you bake
waffles, because in that moment, the power of a thousand suns, could not move
you from plowing the dough?
then what is there to do? Just
rest in peace of love..i can't see any other solution than the one that
arises...a sit does...
A bird sings, not
because it has answers.
But because it has a
Irrespective of whether there are ears to hear.