23th May 2003
Hiya R
I always assumed that questioning mind is an unconditioned mind.
The primary
conditioning is that there is something like a mind, which can be tool to be
used to apperceive.
So it matters little
what questions it comes up with or which answers temporarily satisfy it.
The very arising of a
question, can only happen in the gestalt of duality, isn't it?
A duality of a
"questioner" and the "questioned-about"
I always
thought there are right questions and there are wrong questions.
Nope.
There are questions
and there is a judgement, (either by oneself, or by the icon of authority) about
the arising question.
The essence of all
questions, (and indeed any answer) are.......signatures on flowing waters.
In the stilled waters
(to use a conceptual term for the purpose of this dialogue), the entire
relevancy is no more.
For example
How do I become aware kind of questions I termed as wrong questions and
"What does it mean to be aware?" kind of questions as right questions.
Again R, there is
nothing "right" or "wrong" in phenomenality.
If a question has
arisen, it is a nuance of the functioning of Totality, THROUGH a conditioned
apparatus, the conditioning "fashioning" the very question in that
moment.
With this in mind,
suggest for your consideration, .........all "How"s, infer the
presence of an entity.
It's only to an
entity, that a "How" and a "Who",........ are of relevance.
And only idiots
supply the answer to a How or to a Who.
Idiots are as much
expressions of that same perfection, as any other expression. <LOL>
"What does it
mean to be aware", or similar...........throws the "me" back onto
itself.
The energy which was
moving outwardly through a "How", ..........reverses and falls on
itself.
And sometimes
explosions happen on this falling unto oneself.
Now I
am seeing that a questioning mind is basically a conditioned mind.
VOILA.
Doooobeeee Doooobeee
Dooooo, R.
I am all there is.
If I am all that
there IS, ......who is not-I, .........to whom I can pose a question, any
question.
Ergo can any question
arise, in unicity (to use a conceptual term)?
Ergo any question
(and a corresponding answer) can only arise in a gestalt of seemingly
separation, i.e. duality, ............with each "questioning-me" in
order to be unique, needing to be uniquely conditioned.
And so is.
Why all this hoopla?
To thicken the plot.
ROFLMAO.